Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5365 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2007 06:37:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2007 06:37:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 47198 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2007 06:37:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 47170 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2007 06:37:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 47159 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2007 06:37:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:37:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=PLING_QUERY,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.209.188.32] (HELO dd3334.kasserver.com) (81.209.188.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 06:37:07 +0000 Received: from n428 (www.planconnect.de [84.19.201.106]) by dd3334.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A237429CC1 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:28 +0200 From: Kristian Rink To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: ClientAbortException / Broken Pipe?! Message-ID: <20070815083628.7b91e49a@n428> In-Reply-To: <57732.170.201.180.136.1187103762.squirrel@webmail.chiron.lunarpages.com> References: <20070814155725.62a43be0@n428> <57732.170.201.180.136.1187103762.squirrel@webmail.chiron.lunarpages.com> Organization: zimmer428.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Frank; first off, thanks a load for your reply, much appreciated. ["Frank W. Zammetti" @ Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:02:42 -0400 (EDT)] > Have you noticed if this affects IE users and Firefox users equally? > I ask because there's a known issue (that I've never seen an actual > answer to) where IE causes these exceptions frequently with no ill > effect to anything (other than the overhead of handling the exception > in the VM on the server). I am not sure on that, gonna check that in order to see whether or not you're about to get your box of donuts. ;) However, seriously this is a rather bad thing as I am convinced most of our users to possibly make use of a "default" web browser on their system, having no idea what a browser is, at all... On the other side, having the file transmission terminated / corrupted surely isn't what I would call "no ill effect"... ;) Does anyone have a smart idea how to compensate for this issue? Thanks in advance and best regards, Kristian -- Kristian Rink * http://zimmer428.net * http://flickr.com/photos/z428/ jab: kawazu@jabber.ccc.de * icq: 48874445 * fon: ++49 176 2447 2771 "One dreaming alone, it will be only a dream; many dreaming together is the beginning of a new reality." (Hundertwasser) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org