tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthew Kerle <matthew.ke...@sra.com.au>
Subject tomcat performance on static content over SSL/non-SSL
Date Wed, 15 Aug 2007 05:12:58 GMT
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Matthew Kerle [mailto:matthew.kerle@sra.com.au] 
>> Subject: Re: Removing the port identifier
>>     
> Actually, that's not really true anymore.  The current Tomcat without
> APR is almost as fast as httpd for delivering non-SSL static content,
> and with APR it's pretty much the same for both non-SSL and SSL traffic
> (since it's the same code).  There are reasons to use httpd in front of
> Tomcat, but delivering static content isn't one of them.
>   
really? that's pretty cool, I didn't know that. do you have any metrics?

Apart from integration into a larger site or static content, when would 
you put httpd in front of tomcat?

matt.
<http://threebrightlights.blogspot.com/>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message