Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21075 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2007 16:34:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2007 16:34:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 27701 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2007 16:34:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 27672 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2007 16:34:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 27661 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2007 16:34:35 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:34:35 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jeff.amiel@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.168] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:34:31 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so1326900ugc for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:34:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LfXIuv1JNYYL54eYS5R4MYrojuqUhBN6yD9EfTDN92jmD6HXh70Im6kgoxxLEbSurQRvgriJhtiilckFFT6AsLWCqu9xYg0NDECMi681ZiqHrrfRnXT3rgZGpDw1vIdjvhLUIefkfZjR+J38167SwF1UyODJ/5XG09bBiXtZlvw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sakCn8/YcLYREd/1FwFq71ia2sO6uqPZ56eL9o16QDjZw3tZnkFCYnVrerrIDazQUGUIOeXcEGR2vREYFLjefOmcE0iSgiwzrrJlUhCA7R2w2QgRSzJ8co74xVZaSY4CHA1vThWbN19LMMaP3ATg7B3sxftg4piTFRpE0Y4elJ8= Received: by 10.82.106.14 with SMTP id e14mr9252975buc.1181493250411; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.163.4 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:34:10 -0500 From: "Jeff Amiel" To: "Tomcat Users List" Subject: Re: Hijacked http requests, Tomcat 6.0.13? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <466ADF13.1070106@pidster.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6/10/07, Ola Sundell wrote: > Hello. > > We have just rolled out a major load-balanced tomcat installation. > Currently we're seeing instances in the access logs where HTTP GETs are > "hijacked", ie: While your problem might be wrapped up in your load balancer/architecture layer, take a look at these... http://www.mail-archive.com/users@tomcat.apache.org/msg29221.html http://www.mail-archive.com/users@tomcat.apache.org/msg29356.html http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41772 I'm very interested in any conclusion that you reach. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org