Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13297 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2007 13:25:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jun 2007 13:25:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 72453 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2007 13:25:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 72433 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2007 13:25:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 72422 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2007 13:25:14 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 06:25:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [204.127.200.83] (HELO sccrmhc13.comcast.net) (204.127.200.83) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 06:25:09 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.47] (c-68-50-0-179.hsd1.va.comcast.net[68.50.0.179]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20070628132448013005oeqre>; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:24:48 +0000 Message-ID: <4683B694.5020403@christopherschultz.net> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:24:36 -0400 From: Christopher Schultz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Dynamic form-login-page? References: <218421.58563.qm@web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <218421.58563.qm@web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jon, Jon Wilmoth wrote: > I have run this through the Struts mailing lists and am hoping for a > change/solution. Without digging through the servlet spec myself can > I ask if the Tomcat implementation is the expected behavior (i.e. no > processing of filters on container managed authentication redirects)? > Or is it just not specified and left up to the container > implementation? You might have to ask your question again (on this list) with a new subject (to get new interest), especially because you're asking a different question this time. You could also post to the developer list. My suggestion regarding the Struts list was to find out if anyone has done this on /other/ app servers... basically trying to find out of TC is the odd man out, or if other app servers do this, too. Lobbying to "fix" TC probably won't result in any changes unless TC is doing something others are not. > Is it worth while opening a bugzilla entry for a configurable Tomcat > implementation that wouldn't require a servlet? I wouldn't do that. My experience with the TC devs is that bugzilla entries that question methodology are smacked-down right away with harsh words by the TC devs. Maybe it's just one or two of them. I would ask the question, first. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGg7aT9CaO5/Lv0PARAkpnAJ4u/iheXsG8Jisnj61nyy0psm3ZRwCePzrv GoFXLCV9zPrq/31R1GKr12E= =/595 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org