If you don't start Tomcat as a service, but from the command line, don't output too much. The
command line of Windows is very slow.
Ronald.
On Mon Jun 18 14:01:55 CEST 2007 Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> wrote:
> I have no hard stats to back me up, but I doubt you'll see a significant
> difference in performance as long as the hardware spec is the same. Our
> Tomcat app on Windows 2000 runs for months between restarts, and even
> then the restarts are for OS or application updates, not for Tomcat
> problems. Once I got the memory leaks out of my app, I've had no issues
> with memory usage. A client of ours that runs the app on windows 2003
> has had the same experience.
>
> D
>
> Roger wrote:
> > Hello there!
> >
> > At our office we use Windows 2003 as Tomcat server. For several
> > clients we
> > need to install new servers at an ISP, and we have the choice of using
> > Linux
> > or Windows. As performance is more and more of an issue, we are wondering
> > whether Tomcat will perform better on Linux.
> >
> > - What are your experiences?
> > - We see that Tomcat uses more and more memory over time on our Windows
> > servers. Is that the same on Linux?
> > - Do you have (links to) objective tests or reviews that I can look at?
> >
> > I have found this one, but would like to see some more tests...
> > http://www.webperformanceinc.com/library/reports/windows_vs_linux_part2/index.html
> >
> >
> > Roger
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
|