Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98169 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2007 20:10:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Apr 2007 20:10:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 93428 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2007 20:10:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 93399 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2007 20:10:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 93388 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2007 20:10:34 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:10:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of hassan.schroeder@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.230 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.230] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:10:26 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i26so2769915wxd for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:10:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=C3Ib61iqcMardiwjlrtkf9axVIV/IBBbeugy+V0kq9MLhf1AOQMsJe5Dddz+FxfVmI5R6KMvIUdGgiVMHjg1GSPdj3xas7DFrwo7IxkeMzG0KcHhpZy/ZEwErP31u/BDNkZjnNk+S4twiKxTjkjIYa3gCwFxkS03CdD4ajSdXko= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LAqtocJRxfmK2pEFjNKxXfviuRHw2XQA/iRqqERUXui1M4qOSAyH2h/ptkv9BDq319L+4A2rthPukHgmQk+2jixIcoIV+v7bGJDGARp1jZoRci6ih8iPHsol2JiW0g6mJf85rznckVCjG/cvsPzDCuFJnV8XUmjomA5ceZ/fthk= Received: by 10.70.39.11 with SMTP id m11mr13198513wxm.1177445405849; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.108.2 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4eedb92a0704241310h752fde72u7dc70e0927e9f778@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:10:05 -0700 From: "Hassan Schroeder" To: "Tomcat Users List" Subject: Re: Ragarding the advantages of Apache tomcat server In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <462E518E.1090300@verizon.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 4/24/07, Ajand Saadat wrote: > some disadvantages os oracle AS > 1) oracle implementation of JDK i think No, you can run OC4J with a Sun JDK, but... > 2) very heavy on your resource specially at startup ..that's for sure. I consulted a while last year at a company that was using OC4J (9.0.4.1 IIRC) and it took *forever* to start up; minutes compared to Tomcat's seconds. And configuration was so clunky and convoluted, at least compared to Tomcat. This organization had tried to upgrade to 10.x before and had such problems with it they just gave up, which left them stuck on the 2.3 servlet spec. Before I left they totally changed their main portal application and no longer needed (their single!) EJB, so accepted my recommendation to move to a clustered Tomcat environment. As already pointed out, there's a substantial saving when you need multiple licenses to cover that kind of config. Better performance for less -- sounds like a slogan :-) FWIW, -- Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroeder@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org