tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mladen Turk <mladen.t...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: mod_jk replacement?
Date Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:49:17 GMT
JNeuhoff wrote:
> The same here. Most of the static content (such as *.png) is being served by
> the Apache frontend, and only requests for to our web service are configured
> with the ProxPass directives. I had to use the ProxyPassReverse, too:
> 
> ProxyPreserveHost On
> ProxyPass /ohpr/ http://localhost:8080/ohpr/
>  /ohpr/ http://localhost:8080/ohpr/
> 
> 
> It is slightly slower than mod_jk, but doesn't develop the un-recoverable
> TCP Connections Aborted conditions so easily on Windows 2003 as mod_jk does,

LOL. Can you put some money on that statement?
The http proxy is at least 2 times slower the mod_jk.

Reasons for that (major) are:
1. http needs to reconnect for each request
2. AJP is binary http protocol, so it saves the
    network bandwith up to 20%

Regards,
Mladen.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message