Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53405 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2007 16:09:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2007 16:09:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 31502 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2007 16:09:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 31484 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2007 16:09:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 31473 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2007 16:09:27 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 08:09:27 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.69.96.3] (HELO nelnet.net) (216.69.96.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 08:09:18 -0800 Received: from ([10.120.0.1]) by den-ctrust-01.nelnet.net with ESMTP id 5202100.2569890; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:08:03 -0700 Received: by hqmail.unipac.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:07:32 -0700 Message-ID: <07CD8D709FA44646907645F880C50EE2135FE35F@lin-email-01.nelnet.net> From: "Nelson, Tracy M." To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Standards Complaint Browser Campaign Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:10:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org | From: Pierre Goupil [mailto:goupilpierre@gmail.com] | Sent: Saturday, 06 January, 2007 10:18 | | Does anyone know about Tomcat's generated HTML standards compliance ? In | developpement, I'm using Firefox & Konqueror, but in production they will | be | using IE, so... Can it be that I run into problems ? Um, is there some reason you aren't using the same browser in development that they'll be using in production? If not, you're just opening yourself up for a world of hurt. I would think it would be difficult to explain to your boss why you have to do some emergency bug-fixing at the 11th hour because you didn't test with the same browser that you *knew* they'd be using in production. Don't get me wrong, I use FF for all my development, but as soon as I finish a feature the first thing I do is make sure it works correctly on IE. There's just no excuse for not supporting the browser that dominates the market (even if you have to use hacks or exceptions). ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ The information contained in this message is confidential proprietary property of Nelnet, Inc. and its affiliated companies (Nelnet) and is intended for the recipient only. Any reproduction, forwarding, or copying without the express permission of Nelnet is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail. ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org