tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From JNeuhoff <neuh...@mhccorp.com>
Subject Re: mod_jk replacement?
Date Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:52:40 GMT

Hmm, this might be a good reason to upgrade to Apache 2.2.x then. Currently,
the mod_jk 1.2.20 in conjunction with Apache 2.0.59 is not suitable for a
production system running Windows 2003, and unfortunately we don't have
sysadmins for Linux or Unix, hence I am stuck with Windows 2003 as the
server OS.

Has anybody been successfully running Apache 2.2.x with the mod_proxy_ajp on
a production Windows 2003 server?

J.Neuhoff



Hassan Schroeder-2 wrote:
> 
> On 1/22/07, David Rodríguez Fernández <d-rodriguez@chronoexpres.com>
> wrote:
>> Recently i'm using mod_proxy_ajp, as mod_jk replacement with apache.
> 
> The OP asked about Apache httpd 2.0.x, for which mod_proxy_ajp is
> not available (introduced in 2.2.x).
> 
> And yes, I've used it successfully in production on Linux boxes, but I
> have no experience with it on Windows.
> 
> -- 
> Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroeder@gmail.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-replacement--tf3050993.html#a8506075
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message