Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [OT[ How do I ........?
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:45:56 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <AEF3D568DD1D9E428048C592AA164597051C06F3@USRV-EXCH4.na.uis.unisys.com>
In-Reply-To: <327858f40611151531m359016c2h6d9784ddb1fd0423@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [OT[ How do I ........?
Thread-Index: AccJD5x3yqHbIN88SZytsGRd2T+u4wAABLLw
From: "Caldarale, Charles R" <Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>

> From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.leon@googlemail.com]=20
> Subject: Re: [OT[ How do I ........?
>=20
> as long as you don't parenthesise everything just for the fun of it,
> like in tomcats code, you shouldn't have fear, warrior.
>=20
>   public String getAuthType() {
>         return (this.authType);
>   }
>=20
> being off topic, does someone know the source of this evil? :-)

It's functional (pun intended).

One of my pet peeves as well.  Perhaps the originator thought return
really was a function call?  Or maybe an out of work Lisp programmer?

 - Chuck


THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail
and its attachments from all computers.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org