Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82399 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2006 16:29:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2006 16:29:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 9785 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2006 16:29:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 9521 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2006 16:29:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 9510 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2006 16:29:15 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:29:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [82.70.116.177] (HELO mail.melandra.com) (82.70.116.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:29:13 -0700 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Subject: RE: Handling huge amount data Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:28:50 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Handling huge amount data thread-index: AcbLhQ4r384aZ8teSi+KiHprFweikAAAroqQ From: "Peter Crowther" To: "Tomcat Users List" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Robert Harper [mailto:robert@iat-cti.com]=20 > I've seen the memory rise and fall so if the GC releases=20 > memory, it should be returned to the OS. ... at some point, assuming the GC is capable of compacting the heap to give an entirely free block of memory that can be returned to the OS, and assuming that (in Windows) the OS is under memory pressure and is requesting processes to free what memory they can. I have to say I've never observed a JVM returning memory to the OS, even under quite severe OS memory pressure. Equally I may not have been looking when it did! - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org