Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <44F427A8.2050305@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:40:24 -0400
From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: manager/status data
References: <15147e430608290329g565b5550ted205e6bc0a0371e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44F420B5.9060508@apache.org>
 <15147e430608290422s6d33244ft2e2eea58c78a3235@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <15147e430608290422s6d33244ft2e2eea58c78a3235@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Andr�s Gonz�lez wrote:

> Mmmm... i've been "investigating".
> 
> I think what you say iw the reason for
> jvm-max-memory != jvm-total-memory
> 
> The reason of "free memory"  being != "max-memory - total-memory" i
> think is that "free memory" does not mean "size of aditional memory
> that can be allocated by the jvm" BUT "size of the memory *already*
> alocated but not in use at the moment". That number, for example, gets
> high each time the gc is run.
> 
> So you could define the following ratios:
> 
> %free memory in the JVM = free/total * 100
> %memory allocated vs maximum memory allocatable = total/max * 100
> 
> Am i right?

As far as I am aware, yes you are exactly right.

Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org