tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Gainty" <mgai...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: Tomcat as a standalone webserver. Why not?
Date Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:28:49 GMT
I agree with Peter
crypto algos on routers have stronger keys usually located in much harder to access area than
anything I've seen available on the software side
Then again if your a DoD shop and you need C2 security RSA's process of flipping algos and
keysize every n random minutes beats em all..
+1
Martin --
*********************************************************************
This email message and any files transmitted with it contain confidential
information intended only for the person(s) to whom this email message is
addressed.  If you have received this email message in error, please notify
the sender immediately by telephone or email and destroy the original
message without making a copy.  Thank you.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Lin" <woolfel@gmail.com>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat as a standalone webserver. Why not?


I'm gonna say that's quite a bit of myth here. If SSL is important, get a
cheap SSL enabled router. Doing software SSL is waste of CPU power and
impacts the server's stability.  Anyone that has a lot of HTTPS traffic
shouldn't be using software SSL in my bias opinion.  If you are so desparate
that you need software SSL, as remy says, there's APR.  no need to stick
apache httpd infront.

my bias 2 bits on this topic

peter

On 6/1/06, Remy Maucherat <remy.maucherat@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/1/06, Michael Echerer <mech@tngtech.com> wrote:
> > Danny Lee wrote:
> > > Hi guys!
> > >
> > > I wondering if it's really so good to use Tomcat behind "a real" web
> > > server like Apache or IIS.
> > >
> >
> > In case you have a lot of HTTPS traffic, you'll find that having Apache
> > handle SSL is faster than the Java implementation that Tomcat can offer.
> >
> > IMHO for HTTP traffic performance is "almost" comparable as long as you
> > don't need 100% perf, but for HTTPS Apache is definitely better already
> > with not so many concurrent requests.
>
> Great post. And now, for the real information:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/apr.html
>
> :)
>
> --
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Rémy Maucherat
> Developer & Consultant
> JBoss Inc
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
Mime
View raw message