Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <44313CBC.9050908@kippdata.de>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 17:18:20 +0200
From: Rainer Jung <tomcat-user@kippdata.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050928
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: mod_jk Connector: version question
References: <7A1FBC38-6BB7-4B62-B328-AF7803C8B727@aconex.com>
In-Reply-To: <7A1FBC38-6BB7-4B62-B328-AF7803C8B727@aconex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

1.2.15 ist current stable for linux also. The page is wrong.

I don't know where the binaries come from, so unfortunately at the
moment there seems to be no binary download. If you build yourself, take
1.2.15 sources.

Paul Smith wrote:
> I notice here:
> 
> http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/
> 
> That there are various 'stable' versions for certain O/S.  In  
> particular I notice that mod_jk 1.2.15 is considered stable for  Solaris 
> and w32 but not Linux.
> 
> Any reason? We've done a lot of performance testing with a compiled- 
> from-source 1.2.15 on RedHat, but would really like a pre-compiled  
> version if we could get away from it (rather use the one everyone  uses 
> than one we built).
> 
> The changelog for 1.2.15 would seem to indicate that it's the version  
> we should be using (those issues fixed don't seem O/S specific.)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org