Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55765 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2006 10:54:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2006 10:54:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 7701 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2006 10:54:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 7672 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2006 10:54:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 7659 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2006 10:54:27 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 03:54:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [213.239.213.83] (HELO www.drive2day.de) (213.239.213.83) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 03:54:26 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.drive2day.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD69734036 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:37:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.drive2day.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.drive2day.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02842-10 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:37:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (debian [213.239.213.83]) by www.drive2day.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DE4734033 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:37:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4430FE70.7060404@weboperations.com> Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:52:32 +0300 From: Tp User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Rephrased: Maximum number of simultaneous HTTP connections References: <4430F86B.2080503@weboperations.com> <44314702.60501@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44314702.60501@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at drive2day.de X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Rajeev Jha schrieb: > Tp wrote: > >> >> >> And there seems to be no workaround, because the connection will close >> after the doGet() and doPost() method finishes (is that actually >> true?). So, the only way to keep 3000 simultaneous connections is to >> keep 3000 of those methods from returning, wehich means keeping 3000 >> threads busy. > > > You can try jetty 6 also [ if you are not very particular about using > tomcat ] . Jetty 6 Continuations can help you do a suspend/resume of > request. so a thread is not blocked due to idle wait and you can > multiplex more connections on less threads. > Hi Rajeev, that sound like a possible solution. Is jetty written purely in java and if so do they use nio? How can I suspend/resume processing of requests in jetty? Multiplexing would definelty increase the perfomance, since I would save one thread per connection. >> >> I know for example that BEA and JRun are very performant, but >> unfortuantely BEA is to expensive and then Macromedia only talks about >> the HTTP requests per second in their benchmarking tests, which is >> very different from what I'm asking. >> > requests/second can be misleading in this case. what you want to know is > "# open connections vs. latency for user". > >> yours, >> Tim >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org