Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16854 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2006 17:06:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2006 17:06:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 9887 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2006 17:06:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 9821 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2006 17:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 9798 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2006 17:06:01 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:06:01 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,TRACKER_ID X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rosenberg.leon@googlemail.com designates 64.233.162.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.197] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:06:00 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so668719nzf for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:05:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IDOh6e0Drj+lwahrLG6GVPzBG9PByYTpVFPzOJ+hKWD/N4pIDLDW6ZJpZqJ6k6MjC/2AhqRBp8f0f2Xhdzv3Wgu8vBctkzdYB4ZJjBca5rB13gOVx9joPkqJu7XOmniCepxtyO0zGxBV+ZO4URAFqVk0iReSfgaB9AW3PWaNqyU= Received: by 10.65.113.5 with SMTP id q5mr1022615qbm; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:05:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.103.9 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:05:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <327858f40602030905q3bc714b5w2c34f366d9e05ca7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:05:39 +0100 From: Leon Rosenberg To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Why TC 5.5 vs TC4.1 (perf reasons) In-Reply-To: <20060203170750.5145a005.lionel.farbos@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <327858f40602030700k7e579a03n851aa7caa9c6b646@mail.gmail.com> <20060203170750.5145a005.lionel.farbos@free.fr> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N well we documented it in wiki, which is of course not public, but i can attach some tables from there: Testresults sendMessage 16.06.2004 Servletcontainer=09Host=09Requests/sec=09 Tomcat 4=09lime=0957=09 Tomcat 5=09lime=0963=09 Resin 3.0.5=09lime=0949-50=09 Resin 3.0.7=09lime=0961-69 moveSenderOutboxMailsToTrash 16.06.2004 Servletcontainer=09Host=09Requests/sec=09 Tomcat 4=09lime=0930-40 Resin 3.0.5=09lime=0934-35 Tomcat 5=09lime=0940 Resin 3.0.7=09lime=0943-45 Since it's more then 2 years old the test scripts aren't available anymore, so it's hard to repeat the same test, but you could write a test for yourself, couldn't you? The test included sending a request which forced the app to perform some operation on disk and return a jsp back. Btw, the page was very 'basic' at the start, with 'well html designed and layouted' pages the results started to move in favor of tomcat 5 against resin. regards Leon On 2/3/06, Lionel Farbos wrote: > Thank you Leon, > but, do you have a doc on theses testes ? > > On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:00:25 +0100 > Leon Rosenberg wrote: > > > we have made some performance tests and found out that tomcat 5( > > 5.0.25) is faster with tag heavy pages, probably because of the tag > > pooling. > > Leon > > > > On 2/3/06, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > > > > From: Lionel Farbos [mailto:lionel.farbos@free.fr] > > > > Subject: Why TC 5.5 vs TC4.1 (perf reasons) > > > > > > > > is somebody know a good link that show why Tomcat 5.5 is > > > > better than Tomcat 4.1 ? > > > > > > Don't know of any documented 4.1 vs. 5.5 studies, but Peter Lin > > > published an interesting paper comparing static delivery in 5.0, 5.5, > > > and httpd: > > > http://tomcat.apache.org/articles/benchmark_summary.pdf > > > > > > - Chuck > > > > > > > > > THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIET= ARY > > > MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you > > > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-ma= il > > > and its attachments from all computers. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org