Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76196 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2006 16:08:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2006 16:08:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 74421 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2006 16:08:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 74406 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2006 16:08:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 74395 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2006 16:08:17 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:08:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [194.51.71.172] (HELO mh2.cvf.fr) (194.51.71.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:08:14 -0800 Received: from mh01b.dmz33.cvf (HELO mh2.cvf.fr) ([10.133.20.4]) by mh2.cvf.fr with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2006 17:07:53 +0100 Received: from [10.33.99.113] (helo=ms.int33.cvf) by mh2.cvf.fr with esmtp for id 1F53TV-0005sn-00; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 17:07:53 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=cocarde2.dev33.cvf) by ms.int33.cvf with smtp id 1F53TS-0002hN-00 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 17:07:50 +0100 Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:07:50 +0100 From: Lionel Farbos To: "Tomcat Users List" Subject: Re: Why TC 5.5 vs TC4.1 (perf reasons) Message-Id: <20060203170750.5145a005.lionel.farbos@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <327858f40602030700k7e579a03n851aa7caa9c6b646@mail.gmail.com> References: <327858f40602030700k7e579a03n851aa7caa9c6b646@mail.gmail.com> Organization: free X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-complaints-to: abuse@cvf.fr X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thank you Leon, but, do you have a doc on theses testes ? On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:00:25 +0100 Leon Rosenberg wrote: > we have made some performance tests and found out that tomcat 5( > 5.0.25) is faster with tag heavy pages, probably because of the tag > pooling. > Leon > > On 2/3/06, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > > > From: Lionel Farbos [mailto:lionel.farbos@free.fr] > > > Subject: Why TC 5.5 vs TC4.1 (perf reasons) > > > > > > is somebody know a good link that show why Tomcat 5.5 is > > > better than Tomcat 4.1 ? > > > > Don't know of any documented 4.1 vs. 5.5 studies, but Peter Lin > > published an interesting paper comparing static delivery in 5.0, 5.5, > > and httpd: > > http://tomcat.apache.org/articles/benchmark_summary.pdf > > > > - Chuck > > > > > > THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY > > MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you > > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail > > and its attachments from all computers. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org