Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48471 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2006 03:55:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2006 03:55:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 23859 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2006 03:54:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 23839 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2006 03:54:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 23828 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2006 03:54:56 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:54:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jak-tomcat-user@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:54:55 -0800 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F1bjj-0004mn-6z for users@tomcat.apache.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 04:54:24 +0100 Received: from pool-71-107-250-123.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net ([71.107.250.123]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 04:54:23 +0100 Received: from wbarker by pool-71-107-250-123.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 04:54:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: users@tomcat.apache.org From: "Bill Barker" Subject: Re: mod_jk vs. mod_proxy_ajp Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:54:56 -0800 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <20060124213016.24475.qmail@web32703.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-107-250-123.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "Greg Bobak" wrote in message news:20060124213016.24475.qmail@web32703.mail.mud.yahoo.com... > After trying to get mod_jk to work on Solaris 9 unsuccessfully, I > switched to mod_proxy_ajp. Functionally, it seems to be working fine. > Does anyone know of any advantages of jk vs. proxy_ajp? > Their are a couple of minor bug reports against mod_proxy_ajp. About the only one that looks significant (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36495) is that mod_proxy_ajp is much less agressive about retrying connections on failure than mod_jk. > G. > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org