Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41031 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2005 13:11:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2005 13:11:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 79101 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2005 13:11:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 79074 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2005 13:11:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 79063 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2005 13:11:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 79057 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2005 13:11:01 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 05:11:01 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of justhuckit@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.203 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.203] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.203) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 05:12:30 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so133912wxc for ; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 05:10:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=gi3DZMIIb1X3VJdgJVa2urprveSLXNg2+3P1DkWdOSS2Ytoflmz7MPr/4gXimmnamD/P4bCOctT+WJzegiwyqi/W6ZP53vwrXZRRt5rTpWLcYBCzOXQZT+44WliMXFwVnp7cYy2W8ixZmKXXiREBV3vOkUFUElh2gdVp25JJjIg= Received: by 10.70.75.5 with SMTP id x5mr3495377wxa; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 05:10:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.111.5 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 05:10:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 08:10:40 -0500 From: e To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Apache 2.2 and mod_proxy_ajp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_89106_31377341.1133529040306" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_89106_31377341.1133529040306 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I'm happy to see Apache 2.2 has been released. I'm curious if anyone has any insights into the performance of mod_proxy_ajp vs mod_jk? Is it more efficient, or just easier to configure? Are there any sample configurations available to look at? Thanks, E ------=_Part_89106_31377341.1133529040306--