Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85659 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2005 21:22:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2005 21:22:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 13335 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2005 21:22:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 13313 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2005 21:22:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 13302 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2005 21:22:39 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:22:39 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [66.80.60.30] (HELO mail.megapathdsl.net) (66.80.60.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:24:05 -0800 Received: from [66.80.232.194] (HELO Alla) by fe.mail.megapathdsl.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.2) with ESMTP id 333462626 for users@tomcat.apache.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:22:13 -0800 From: "Alla Winter" To: Subject: FW: Upgrading Tomcat Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:22:10 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcX2ua07Dxegx1SSQ3WTUrdlvQeangAAGVzQAACmZyA= Message-ID: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thanks for finding this link. Beside the explanation on various packages of TOMCAT, the message in there also suggests that it is not worthy to use APACHE on a top of TOMCAT due to TOMCAT now is handling static pages almost as good as APACHE. But what about handling SSL - somewhere I read that APACHE handles encryption much better than TOMCAT. Is it still true? -----Original Message----- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:05 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Upgrading Tomcat > From: Rhino [mailto:rhino1@sympatico.ca] > Subject: Re: Upgrading Tomcat > > I'm having trouble finding the note you mentioned in the mailing list > archives. It's here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=113332618812952&w=2 > I'm trying to figure out the following: > - does "Core" include the Administration webapp? It did in 5.0, does not in 5.5. > - does "Core" include the Deployer? If not, what does the Deployer do? No. See the referenced e-mail. > - does "Core" include the Embedded bundle? If not, what does > it do? No. See the referenced e-mail. > - when do I want do download "Core" as a Windows Executable > and when do I want to download it as a zip? I never use the .exe since it's missing the .bat (and .sh) scripts, which are useful for debugging. See the referenced e-mail. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org