Return-Path: 
 <users-return-137059-apmail-tomcat-users-archive=tomcat.apache.org@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 53131 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2005 15:07:57 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Dec 2005 15:07:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 21902 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2005 15:07:43 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 21888 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2005 15:07:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.tomcat.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 21877 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2005 15:07:42 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 21874 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2005 15:07:42 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:07:42 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of xaymaca@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.192 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.184.192] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.192)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:07:41 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i7so641643wra
        for <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>;
 Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:07:21 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=Jx5gxjtX9Sclnlq0u5AeJV59eo92uU6JyEqsaokblYPXA4ZfMV751+Dsw3rhUVeaeTWCbG0c9B9Uc63QMBT1B2HoRX4QO90XE7Fz4ioU/25zNnaFJafd4y02HUY8Cfr5G2WG9Sn7XKHMsc0szlprTD8f3MyONUHB4t5qe4I8yU8=
Received: by 10.54.124.2 with SMTP id w2mr1566415wrc;
        Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:07:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.137.6 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 07:07:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <694007130512090707g35267a16sd83cb3df8bf147ba@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:07:14 -0500
From: Vinny <xaymaca@gmail.com>
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Why only one Connector per Service?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

I am curious as to the reason there is only one connector for each service?
I have a machine with 3 IP addresses. 1 IP is being used by another
program running on
port 80. That leaves me with 2 IPs that I can use for tomcat. The
standalone virtual host
method that I have used in the past seems to assume that tomcat will
have exclusive use of
0.0.0.0:80 and that is obviously not the case in my situation. I've
seen solutions that entail using
multple <Service/> in the server.xml. Another solution would be to use
a different tomcat instance on each port. Are these the only options
available for a standalone tomcat config?

tomcat 5.5.12
jdk 1.5
linux

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org