From users-return-135885-apmail-tomcat-users-archive=tomcat.apache.org@tomcat.apache.org Wed Nov 16 19:52:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20380 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2005 19:52:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2005 19:52:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 18036 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2005 19:52:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 17927 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2005 19:52:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 17916 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2005 19:52:20 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:52:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [192.146.101.72] (HELO sw3.lexmark.com) (192.146.101.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:53:54 -0800 Subject: Re: mod_jk bug serving up flash on non 2003 servers? To: "Tomcat Users List" X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.12 February 13, 2003 Message-ID: From: dhay@lexmark.com Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:19:02 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on smtp5b/Lex/Lexmark (Release 6.5.4FP1 | June 19, 2005) at 11/16/2005 14:21:09 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Mark, > I have tested the following combination and it works quite happily: > Win XP SP2, fully patched > Apache 2.0.54 > mod_jk 1.2.14 > TC5.5.HEAD > Firefox client and IE6 client Have you tested your config with an swf file? I've got a pretty similar setup, and everything else works fine. > Another thing to check is can you access the swf file on XP if you > connect directly to Tomcat? Yep, checked that, and it works fine. Just not if I go through load balancer. I've also tried it with a regular flash file (non-Laszlo) and it starts to load and then can't seem to complete. cheers, David |---------+----------------------------> | | Mark Thomas | | | | | | | | | 11/15/2005 06:09 | | | PM | | | Please respond to| | | "Tomcat Users | | | List" | | | | |---------+----------------------------> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: Tomcat Users List | | cc: | | Subject: Re: mod_jk bug serving up flash on non 2003 servers? | >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| dhay@lexmark.com wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Yes, as I mentioned, we can access "non-swf files without a problem". We > have exactly the same setup, I believe, for 2003 Server and XP Sp2 - it > runs from the same installer, which has no checking to distinguish between > the two. > > We also have Apache talking to Tomcat via mod_jk quite happily, except for > swf files. Can you verify that you can access swf files on your setup? > > I believe we work fine with XP sp1. > > Anything else I can check, or info I can provide? How can I do any kind of > debugging? > > cheers, > > David > x54680 Hmmm. Using an installer should eliminate the config issues. It is also odd that it works for all files apart from swf ones. I have tested the following combination and it works quite happily: Win XP SP2, fully patched Apache 2.0.54 mod_jk 1.2.14 TC5.5.HEAD Firefox client and IE6 client Using the latest TC5 code from SVN shouldn't make any difference. The important thing is it proves it can work on XP SP2. My best guess right is soemthing at the OS level. The firewall springs to mind but I can't see how. One suggestion would be to try telneting to your two servers and compare the headers to see what might be different. Another thing to check is can you access the swf file on XP if you connect directly to Tomcat? The only thing I am sure of right now is that this is some form of configuration issue. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org