Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58030 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2005 17:41:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2005 17:41:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 48223 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2005 17:40:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 48177 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2005 17:40:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 48135 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2005 17:40:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 47999 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2005 17:40:44 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:40:44 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [192.63.108.53] (HELO usbb-lacimss3.unisys.com) (192.63.108.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:40:40 -0700 Received: from USBB-LACGW3.na.uis.unisys.com ([129.224.98.43]) by usbb-lacimss3 with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:55:12 -0400 Received: from USBB-LACGW3.na.uis.unisys.com ([129.224.98.44]) by USBB-LACGW3.na.uis.unisys.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:39:56 -0400 Received: from USRV-EXCH1.na.uis.unisys.com ([129.225.81.6]) by USBB-LACGW3.na.uis.unisys.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:39:56 -0400 Received: from USRV-EXCH4.na.uis.unisys.com ([192.61.245.232]) by USRV-EXCH1.na.uis.unisys.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:39:57 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: static server implementation? Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:39:56 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: static server implementation? Thread-Index: AcXbHLtKWcioYuFASQCS80dOMruUNAAADZEw From: "Caldarale, Charles R" To: "Tomcat Users List" , "Tomcat Users List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2005 17:39:57.0997 (UTC) FILETIME=[7301F5D0:01C5DB1D] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: John Laughton [mailto:jlaughto@cisco.com]=20 > Subject: Re: static server implementation? >=20 > I ended up created a second context in tomcat that allows=20 > access to the static content (ie. large jpegs) I'm confused. Why wasn't Tomcat's default servlet sufficient? It's sole purpose is to deliver static content. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org