Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98852 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2005 23:02:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2005 23:02:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 16521 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2005 23:02:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16510 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2005 23:02:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16495 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2005 23:02:44 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:02:44 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [216.81.251.1] (HELO mail.printtime.com) (216.81.251.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:02:58 -0700 Received: from [216.243.225.47] (HELO [192.168.2.128]) by mail.printtime.com (Stalker SMTP Server 1.8b8) with ESMTP id S.0003495205 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:06:30 -0500 Message-ID: <4314E512.2040606@printtime.com> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:00:34 -0500 From: Brian Cook Reply-To: bcook@printtime.com Organization: Print Time Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Does Tomcat run better on Linux or Windows? References: <32F450EC55CFA243BC624DF12BDD2ECB2405C8@mxserver1.microsymplex.local> In-Reply-To: <32F450EC55CFA243BC624DF12BDD2ECB2405C8@mxserver1.microsymplex.local> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020907040005030505000806" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --------------020907040005030505000806 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Wow this seem likely to start flame war. Since it is written in Java there is really not much of a difference. The only thing that comes to mind is that you have to reboot windows every time you need to make a change to the CLASSPATH, JAVA_HOME, or TOMCAT_HOME variables which can be a pain. I will also throw in that it is my personal option(NOTE: For any extremists on the list I said my option. Not an absolute fact. Just one guys experience) that you spend a lot less time maintaining Linux. This is mainly because Linux is so modular that you can uninstall everything but the parts you want. So the only things I have to keep up with and patch are the Kernel, MySQL, Apache, and Tomcat. No GUI, no extra services, etc. Chad Lester wrote: > Is Tomcat more stable on Linux or Windows 2003? What are the pros/cons > of using it on each platform? > > > > Thank you in advance for your help and advice, > > Chad > > --------------020907040005030505000806 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org --------------020907040005030505000806--