Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35659 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2005 19:30:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2005 19:30:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 31051 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2005 19:29:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 31032 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2005 19:29:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 31010 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2005 19:29:46 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of woolfel@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.192 as permitted sender) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.192) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:29:40 -0700 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so430489rng for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:29:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CreE1eaT3gclRdG6/bEKO3BCRDOmHG0N1YfMTw5Z3aRhncHW+NqAdNMa0CcrbquyhNHIwhshzQW2p1H5MVGZhMnAg4R7IV5oBK5T7U8J3MkJa8/QLktsTcuTmlNT45dhuNKwmvPRKgiLFWo9tZ+JvMUfaHIu2Htz/MJ/FxUa9+A= Received: by 10.38.152.59 with SMTP id z59mr626362rnd; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.86.39 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <27e674a905060212297ecf2cd3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:29:30 -0400 From: Peter Lin Reply-To: Peter Lin To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Scalability issue question In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N you could always look at the new performance benchmark i ran for static files on the resources page. it shows the performance of tomcat 5 as the number of clients increase and file size increases. hope that helps peter On 6/2/05, Wallace, Scott wrote: > Network is 100megabit > Server are 2- HP DL380g4 Dual 3.4gig Xeon chips with 4gig of Ram running > Win2003 >=20 >=20 > Scott Wallace > Livelink Global Infrastructure Coordinator > swallace@kmg.com > 405-270-2027 wk > 405-323-2237 cell > 405-228-6027 fax > "I have an existential map; it has 'you are here' > written all over it. " - Steven Wright >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Hari Mailvaganam [mailto:hariubc@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 1:59 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Scalability issue question >=20 > It can be a good idea to have it load balanced from a performance and > uptime point of view. >=20 > It is hard to absolutely decipher what each Tomcat can specifically > handle in terms of load. A load test, which emualates user actions, may > give you a ball park. >=20 > The dependencies are on network, server OS, memory, JVM etc. >=20 > regards, >=20 > Hari Mailvaganam >=20 > On 6/2/05, Wallace, Scott wrote: > > Currently using IIS and the ISAPI Tomcat redirect. Would like to > just > > use Tomcat instead but don't know if it can handle my static content. > > The book "Apache Tomcat 5" published by WROX warns of performance > > issues with static content, but ComputerWorld just did an article > > about Weather.com running their site on multiple load balanced Tomcat > > servers servicing 18 million hits a day. > > http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,925 > > 83 > > ,00.html > > > > I currently only get around 250 k hits per day but we're about to > > integrate email with Livelink and that puts me into a whole new > > performance arena. Any thoughts or guidance would be appreciated. > > > > Scott Wallace > > Livelink Global Infrastructure Coordinator swallace@kmg.com > > 405-270-2027 wk > > 405-323-2237 cell > > 405-228-6027 fax > > "I have an existential map; it has 'you are here' > > written all over it. " - Steven Wright > > > > > > > > Important Notice!! > > If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, any use, > distribution or copying of the message is prohibited. > > Please let me know immediately by return e-mail if you have received > this message by mistake, then delete the e-mail message. > > Thank you. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > > > > >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org