Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14705 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2005 16:40:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2005 16:40:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 58292 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2005 16:40:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 57800 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2005 16:40:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 57786 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2005 16:40:12 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from itdsrvmail00.utep.edu (HELO itdsrvmail00.utep.edu) (129.108.0.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:40:11 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:44:30 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions Thread-Index: AcT1JmzfqgnQ5u1NTNG5hTvCCFHYWQCDQ9cg From: "Casas, Claudia" To: "Tomcat Users List" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Well, for now it is working. But I am thinking in moving to the jk1 again soon. Really ironic, I decided to choose jk2 so that I would not have to upgrade in a while, but well, back luck. -----Original Message----- From: QM [mailto:qm300@brandxdev.net]=20 Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 7:04 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 06:02:14PM +0100, Nikola Milutinovic wrote: : Sorry. I was as bitten by the news as you are. The thing is, if it is=20 : working, not only shouldn't you fix it, but relax. JK2 is OK - if it=20 : works. It is a stable mechanism, it is just not going to be developed=20 : any more. If the present functionality satisfies you (as it does satisfy=20 : me), keep on using it. There's a downside to this philosophy: should you encounter a JK2 bug down the line, you'll likely be on your own to fix it. Doubt it? Look at typical responses to list posts for Tomcat 3 or Tomcat 4 help... ;) -QM --=20 software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org