Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82778 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2004 15:44:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2004 15:44:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 9320 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2004 15:44:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9259 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2004 15:44:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9228 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2004 15:44:14 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [63.244.250.133] (HELO warhawk.mpi.com) (63.244.250.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 08:44:12 -0700 Received: from thunderbolt.mpi.com (thunderbolt [63.244.253.70]) by warhawk.mpi.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id i97FiArG027990 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:44:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from US-VS1.corp.mpi.com (us-be2.corp.mpi.com [63.244.252.32]) by thunderbolt.mpi.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id i97FhYvZ010645 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:43:59 -0400 (EDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: versions 2.3 and 2.4 of web.xml Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:43:12 -0400 Message-ID: <9C5166762F311146951505C6790A9CF80229C334@US-VS1.corp.mpi.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: versions 2.3 and 2.4 of web.xml Thread-Index: AcSsggzzczaKKZLITyiasJ6TESakvwAAe3xQ From: "Shapira, Yoav" To: "Tomcat Users List" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N H= i, I didn't follow the thread on include-prelude (not my cup of tea). If= you can post a web.xml (or better yet, a simple WAR containing this web.xml) that is invalid according to its own declared DTD and yet Tomcat doesn't complain, that'd be great. I don't have time to look a= t this now, there are more important issues around, but maybe eventually... ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics >-----Original Message----- >From: Steve Kirk [mailto:tomcat-user@web-startup.co.uk] >Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 11:27 AM >To: 'Tomcat Users List' >Subject: RE: versions 2.3 and 2.4 of web.xml > > >Yoav, I see your point in your previousu post on this thread re 2.3 D= TD >still being valid. However what do you think regarding the possible b= ug >mentioned in my later post below? (i.e. that a 2.4 feature used in a= 2.3 >file does not cause an exception, but instead is silently ignored). The >validation that tomcat does on web.xml is usually very thorough, so this >case seems to be a bit of an anomaly. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Steve Kirk [mailto:tomcat-user@web-startup.co.uk] >> Sent: Thursday 30 September 2004 18:03 >> To: 'Tomcat Users List' >> Subject: RE: versions 2.3 and 2.4 of web.xml >> >> >> >> Further to my note below, plus my previous posts on "Who has got >> to work?", I think I might have stumbled across t= he >> answers to both myself. >> >> Basically my web.xml files were based on the v2.3 files that >> shipped with >> the standard installation, and using these seems to have >> silently suppressed >> the 2.4 features, including . >> >> Not sure if this is a bug - if web.xml encounters a tag which >> it knows is >> valid in its current version, but not in the earlier version >> declared in the >> tag, should an exception be thrown, or should it >> silently ignore >> it? >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Steve Kirk [mailto:tomcat-user@web-startup.co.uk] >> > Sent: Thursday 30 September 2004 17:32 >> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' >> > Subject: versions 2.3 and 2.4 of web.xml >> > >> > >> > >> > Only just noticed this, looks like a possible bug, but >> maybe there's a >> > reason behind it? >> > >> > Basically, the default web.xml files included within the >> > standard webapps of >> > 5.0.27 and 5.0.28 seem to be a mix of webapp v2.3 and v2.4 - >> > anyone know if >> > there is a reason for this, or is this a bug? >> > >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------= -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.or= g >> >> > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------= >To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business com= munication, and may contain information that is confidential, propriet= ary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individua= l(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, d= isclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended reci= pient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system= and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org