Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56513 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2004 23:04:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2004 23:04:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 40774 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2004 23:03:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 40712 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2004 23:03:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 40699 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2004 23:03:50 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.217.242.88] (HELO anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net) (194.217.242.88) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:03:49 -0700 Received: from steve-kirk.demon.co.uk ([80.177.0.37] helo=sjklaptop) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CMwpV-00055d-0I for tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:03:46 +0000 From: "Steve Kirk" To: "'Tomcat Users List'" Subject: RE: JNDI DataSource GlobalResources problem Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:03:28 +0100 Message-ID: <000201c4bc79$2dffcca0$0201a8c0@sjklaptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <9C5166762F311146951505C6790A9CF801FC395C@US-VS1.corp.mpi.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yoav said (re: context.xml files): > They're a TC-only feature. Other containers go about it different = ways. and: > Context.xml files are NOT designed to increase portability at all. > They're a convenience feature. In fact, they're a sinkhole for > beginners to REDUCE their portability in favor of short-term > convenience. That's why I don't like them. OK, got all that. But now I've thought it all through again, it's not = clear what the "right" way to do it is. In other words how should I look to configure and/or elements so that I can move beyond "beginner" ? ;) All the alternative ways of configuring a webapp seem to have something against them from the point of view of portability, since they = all use server.xml or context.xml, which as I understand it are both TC-proprietary. I note that the TC docs currently recommend using context.xml within either the conf folder or the warfile, rather than including within the server.xml itself, but both of these recommened approaches seem to be non-portable to other containers....? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org