tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phillip Qin <Phillip....@shareowner.com>
Subject RE: Apache, Tomcat and mod_jk2 - question about layout
Date Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:36:36 GMT
Think of an empty jk2.properties.

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen Williams [mailto:anw@csunv.com] 
Sent: October 27, 2004 7:20 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Apache, Tomcat and mod_jk2 - question about layout


Thanks so much.  I'll try it today or tomorrow.  Even though you didn't
change it, could you please post your jk2.properties?  Don't need the
httpd.conf- it's pretty straightforward.

Thanks again,
allen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phillip Qin [mailto:Phillip.Qin@shareowner.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:23 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Apache, Tomcat and mod_jk2 - question about layout
>
>
> This is my workers2.properties (not workers.properties). You don't 
> need to touch jk2.properties or httpd.conf.
>
>
> # shared memory handling.
> [shm]
> file=C:\Program Files\Apache Group\Tomcat 4.1\work\jk2.shm 
> size=1048576
>
> # Defines a load balancer named lb. Use even if you only have one 
> machine. #[lb:lb]
>
> # example socket channel, explicitly set port and host 
> [channel.socket:localhost:8009] #tomcatId=localhost:8009
> port=8009
> host=127.0.0.1
> tomcatId=jvm1
>
> # define the worker
> [ajp13:localhost:8009]
> channel=channel.socket:localhost:8009
> #group=lb
>
> # uri mapping
> #[uri:/examples/*]
> #group=lb
>
> [uri:investments.localhost/lciponline/*]
> #group=lb
>
> [uri:test.localhost/onlinestore/*]
> #group=lb
>
> #[uri:/investments/*]
> #group=lb
>
> # ROOT
> [uri:investments.localhost/*]
>
> [uri:test.localhost/*]
>
> [uri:investments.localhost/manager/*]
> #group=lb
>
> [uri:test.localhost/manager/*]
>
> [uri:investments.localhost/admin/*]
>
> [uri:test.localhost/admin/*]
>
> [status:]
> info=Status worker, displays runtime information
>
> [uri:investments.localhost/jkstatus/*]
> #worker=status:status
> group=status:
>
> [uri:test.localhost/jkstatus/*]
> #worker=status:status
> group=status:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Allen Williams [mailto:anw@csunv.com]
> Sent: October 27, 2004 9:03 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Apache, Tomcat and mod_jk2 - question about layout
>
>
> Second request:
>
> Would you post what you did to integrate the two?  I've followed all 
> the "clues" on both apache and tomcat websites, which is exactly what 
> it says in three books I've got, and I still get a "File Not Found" 
> error from apache when I go to the dynamic content.
>
> Is there some reference and description of the parameters and values 
> for the workers.properties, jk2.properties, and httpd.conf files?  
> Although the Jakarta website has some of this, the examples showing 
> the parameters being
> used are pretty sparse.  What does JkMount do?  I can't find this
> documented
> anywhere.
>
> I assure you, I've spent DAYS on the websites, in the books, and 
> looking for documentation whereever I can find it.
>
> Thanks,
> Allen
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: footh [mailto:footh@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 10:08 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: Apache, Tomcat and mod_jk2 - question about layout
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the tips.  I believe the site will be using
> > SSL at some point so that may be a reason to use
> > Apache.  But for the time being, I suppose I might as
> > well use Tomcat standalone knowing that I can just
> > "flip a switch" (well, a couple switches) to get
> > Apache back in there.
> >
> >
> > --- Peter Johnson <peter@wizardslair.net> wrote:
> >
> > > I am using Apache2, jk2 and Tomcat5 but I do so
> > > because I want to
> > > offload the SSL and compression onto a first tier
> > > leaving the second
> > > just to generate the content. I also use the first
> > > tier for uri
> > > rewriting using mod_rewrite.
> > >
> > > If you don't need uri rewriting I would consider
> > > using Tomcat standalone
> > > as the performance is likely to be comparable but
> > > the reduced admin by
> > > removing Apache and jk would be a big benefit. Why
> > > have more steps that
> > > can go wrong? More to debug when it does?
> > >
> > > To answer the questions from your first email. The
> > > images will be being
> > > returned from Apache, remember that an image is a separate 
> > > request. I will qualify this by stating that any dynamically
> > > generated images will
> > > be returned by Tomcat.
> > >
> > > Regarding the directory setup ... it is whatever
> > > works best for you. I
> > > personally do the following:
> > > Apache Content -> /sites/static/<site name>/....... Tomcat Content

> > > -> /sites/webapps/<site name>/....
> > >
> > > This means that all of the Tomcat content is outside
> > > the realm of Apache
> > > and thus security concerns are reduced.
> > >
> > > my 2c,
> > >
> > > PJ
> > >
> > > footh wrote:
> > >
> > > >I've read the FAQ on the topic of whether to go
> > > >through Apache or just use Tomcat stand-alone and frankly, it 
> > > >seemed inconclusive.  Then I did a
> > > search
> > > >and it seemed the general consensus was to use
> > > Tomcat
> > > >stand-alone for development enviroments and Apache
> > > for
> > > >production.
> > > >
> > > >Really, that's all I went by.  I figured using
> > > Apache,
> > > >Tomcat and mod_jk was the more robust solution and better suited 
> > > >for the long haul.  More and more features will likely be added 
> > > >to this site so I
> > > need
> > > >to be forward thinking.
> > > >
> > > >--- Parsons Technical Services <parsonstechnical@earthlink.net>
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Unless you have a reason, why not let Tomcat do it
> > > >>all?
> > > >>
> > > >>Doug
> > > >>
> > > >>----- Original Message -----
> > > >>From: "footh" <footh@yahoo.com>
> > > >>To: <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > >>Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 5:13 PM
> > > >>Subject: Apache, Tomcat and mod_jk2 - question
> > > about
> > > >>layout
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>After going through all the documentation, I have gotten 
> > > >>>mod_jk2 to forward jsp requests to Tomcat.
> > >
> > > >>>However, I have a question about the layout...
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Essentially, my site will be .html pages with
> > > some
> > > >>>occasional .jsp pages (it will likely change in
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>the
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>future to all .jsp/servlets, but for now that's
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>the
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>way it is).  Right now, I have the Apache
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>DocumentRoot
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>pointing to the directory containing the site and
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>also
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>I have a Tomcat Context with a blank path
> > > property
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>and
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>docBase property pointing to the same site
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>directory.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>So, basically, I can browse the site by going to 
> > > >>>http://localhost:8080 using Tomcat in addition to
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>the
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>standard http://localhost address (through
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>Apache).
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>And, with mod_jk2 working, I can also hit 
> > > >>>http://localhost/xyz.jsp and have a .jsp page
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>execute
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>correctly.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>So, my question is, is this the correct way to configure this 
> > > >>>kind of web site?  When .jsp pages
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>are
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>hit, are the images actually being loaded by
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>Apache or
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>by Tomcat?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>A problem I've discovered is that if I need to
> > > use
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>a
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>web.xml file in the WEB-INF directory, I can
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>actually
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>browse to the WEB-INF directory when hitting the
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>site
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>through port 80 (Apache).  Obviously, this is not
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>a
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>good idea so I am thinking there is probably a
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>better
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>way to set this site up.  Any ideas?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Thanks,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>JF
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> > === message truncated ===
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> 
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


!DSPAM:418035e5232225791619741!

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message