Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17333 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2004 16:08:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2004 16:08:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 54987 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2004 16:07:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 54924 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2004 16:07:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 54878 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2004 16:07:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [205.150.136.12] (HELO mail.squigly.com) (205.150.136.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:07:33 -0700 Received: by mail.squigly.com (Postfix, from userid 511) id DA59C2740; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:41:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.squigly.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76389518 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:41:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:41:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Alex X-Sender: To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Load Balancing Configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N when i was playing with sticky sessions (ultimately didn't get it working -- which is why i went with the tomcat cluster and session replciation .. which has it's benefits) try putting StickySession=1 against the channel and/or the lb group. does this affect things? i remember having it in for each channel and at the time i thought it was right ... only the jk2 adapter didn't support it. On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Fournier, Pete wrote: > Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:58:28 -0400 > From: "Fournier, Pete" > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Load Balancing Configuration > > Found the message. Unless I am reading it wrong that is for Clustering. > I am looking at configuring Load Balancing with sticky sessions. > > I have managed to get the adaptor to route requests to each of the > Tomcat instances since I originally posted yesterday, the only remaining > problem is the session is not sticking. I can see it bouncing between > the two of them. > > My current round-robin-non-session-sticking workers2.properties file is > below. > > Thanks, --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org