Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19321 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2004 12:02:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Sep 2004 12:02:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 62230 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2004 12:02:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 62204 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2004 12:02:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 62190 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2004 12:02:04 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.172.82.234] (HELO mail3.qas.com) (195.172.82.234) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 05:02:03 -0700 Received: from orion.qas.com (orion.qas.com [150.150.100.34]) by mail3.qas.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:01:59 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Upgrade to 5.0.27 Causes Performance Problems Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:01:57 +0100 Message-ID: <5684A7E6FB10504393A2806C1F4C021003B0E17A@orion.qas.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Upgrade to 5.0.27 Causes Performance Problems Thread-Index: AcSQ4vvKUIwiWedVRg6cfruBoHIGkwAAXM9w From: "Allistair Crossley" To: "Tomcat Users List" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Mike, The standard-fare answer to this type of question is to get a profiler and = measure where the cpu is going inside the code itself. did you not test thi= s on your development server before launching the upgrade? ADC > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Scott [mailto:mike.scott@Rightmove.co.uk] > Sent: 02 September 2004 12:51 > To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: Upgrade to 5.0.27 Causes Performance Problems >=20 >=20 > Upgrading to Tomcat 5.0.27 on Solaris 8, from 3.3 (a big=20 > jump, I know), > and in live use we're seeing its CPU usage run away after a=20 > few minutes. > If I use prstat -L to look at the individual threads, it's=20 > java/2 that's > getting all the CPU time. If I then send the java process a SIGQUIT > signal to get it to dump a complete stack trace, I get output=20 > including > a line like "VM Thread" prio=3D5 tid=3D0x00126830 nid=3D0x2=20 > runnable", which I > believe is the java/2 thread, but with no stack trace for that thread. >=20 > Does anyone have any ideas about what's going on, or any other > diagnostics to try? >=20 > --=20 > Mike Scott >=20 > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > This email has been scanned for all viruses by the=20 > MessageLabs service.=20 > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org >=20 >=20 =20 ------------------------------------------------------- QAS Ltd. Developers of QuickAddress Software www.qas.com Registered in England: No 2582055 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474 ------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org