Inititally I would have agreed. However, after lots of reading, monkeying
around, and working out everything, I can now say that we have implemented
successfully the jk2 adapter with both iis5 and apache2 withiout issue.
for it to work properly, i found you needed to have virtual-hosts in
tomcat .. if you were doing something a bit more complex with multiple
hosts.
how many exact pages/traffic do they get? i can't answer that right now.
i'll take a look in a bit. haven't noticed any problems though.
-alex - pass the salt...
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Brantley Hobbs wrote:
> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:19:53 -0400
> From: Brantley Hobbs <bhobbs@itos.uga.edu>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> To: Tomcat Users List <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5/Apache 2/JK2- production quality?
>
> I second this.
>
> I've had nothing but trouble out of JK2, configuration difficulties on Apache and just
flatly broken on IIS.
>
> The original JK adapter has worked great.
>
> -Brantley
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
|