Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4042 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2004 19:40:25 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2004 19:40:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 49789 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2004 19:39:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 49771 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2004 19:39:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 49757 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2004 19:39:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host12.host12-server.com) (64.141.102.216) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2004 19:39:54 -0000 Received: from MOOSE (adsl-216-102-196-220.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.102.196.220]) by host12.host12-server.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i1NJdvj17958 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:39:57 -0500 From: "Filip Hanik \(lists\)" To: "Tomcat Users List" Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.19 cluster problem Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:39:44 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <403A556E.8030501@terra.es> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N yes, three servers in a cluster means three times the amount of memory used for session data. checking your -Xmx setting might be a good thing -----Original Message----- From: Antonio Fiol Bonn�n [mailto:fiol.bonnin@terra.es] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 11:33 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.19 cluster problem Filip Hanik (lists) wrote: >>In any case could a cluster node that ran out of memory destroy the >>entire cluster? >> >> > >it shouldn't, it can temporary slow it down if the node that is down is >accepting connections and broad casting its membership. >I'm running a load test right now with the latest version to make sure that >I am not BS:ing you here :) > >Filip > > > Hi, If you use in-memory replication, and the source of your OutOfMemoryError is that you have too many objects stored in sessions, or those objects are too big, or whatever, I think this could bring down your entire cluster. What do you think, Filip? Antonio --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.585 / Virus Database: 370 - Release Date: 2/11/2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org