Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20040209231905.0212ca08@mail.naccrra.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 23:23:19 -0500
To: "Tomcat Users List" <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
From: David OBrien <dobrien@naccrra.org>
Subject: Re: done did not found a worker
In-Reply-To: <1076379992.25405.184.camel@nick.docmagic.com>
References: <1076355191.25401.0.camel@nick.docmagic.com>
 <Law11-OE32vqQ7SzE2N00002543@hotmail.com>
 <4417.208.48.139.163.1076377065.squirrel@www.greenhydrant.com>
 <1076379992.25405.184.camel@nick.docmagic.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="=====================_78912578==.ALT"

--=====================_78912578==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 09:26 PM 2/9/2004, Nicholas Bernstein wrote:
>On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 17:37, David Rees wrote:
> > On Mon, February 9, 2004 at 4:41 pm, Charles Daniel wrote:
> > >
> > > Give up trying to use Apache2 with mod_jk.  After spending days on the
> > > message boards trying to solve this one, I was ultimately told by the
> > > so-called "experts" that  "I had a network configuration problem and that
> > > some process was likely to be either already using or blocking port 
> 8009".
> >
> > Hmm, I've had no problems at all using mod_jk with Apache2 on both various
> > Linux and SGI Irix machines.  I must be a so-called "expert".  ;-)
> >
> > -Dave
>
>if you've got a minute, take a look @ the configs I posted
>http://nicholasbernstein.com/tomcat/

Are you using workers2.properties with mod_jk and not mod_jk2 ??

JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd/conf/workers2.properties
change to workers.properties

JkLogFile /var/log/httpd/mod_jk.log

In your...

workers.properties:
         workers.tomcat_home=/u/internet/tomcat/
         workers.java_home=/usr/java/
         ps=/
         worker.list=ajp13
*******
         worker.ajp12.lbfactor=1
         13 NOT 12
*******
         worker.ajp13.port=8009
         worker.ajp13.host=localhost
         worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
         worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
         wporker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers= ajp13
         worker.inprocess.type
         worker.inprocess.class_path=$(workers.tomcat_home)$(ps)lib$(ps)tomcat.jar
         worker.inprocess.cmd_line=start
         worker.inprocess.jvm_lib=$(workers.java_home)$(ps)jre$(ps)lib$(ps)i386$(ps)classic$(ps)libjvm.so
         worker.inprocess.stdout=$(workers.tomcat_home)$(ps)logs$(ps)inprocess.stdout
         worker.inprocess.stderr=$(workers.tomcat_home)$(ps)logs$(ps)inprocess.stderr

Also I have had to define a lvmroute in my server.xml that is the same name 
as the named worker in your case ajp13

-Dave


>and let me know if you see anything wrong with the setup. I'd rather
>stick to apache2; i'm using redhat ES and it looks like they've made a
>lot of RH specific patches to httpd source, so it probably performs a
>lot better that compiling 1.x from source.
>
>
>
>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>--
>+---------------------------------------------------------------+
>| Nicholas Bernstein            | nick@docmagic.com             |
>| UNIX Systems Administrator    | http://www.docmagic.com       |
>| Document Systems Inc.         |                               |
>| gpg: F706 8C4E 78FA DDDD 53A0 019F D983 FE28 2002 D1F3        |
>+---------------------------------------------------------------+

--=====================_78912578==.ALT--