tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Funk <funk...@joedog.org>
Subject Re: StringBuffer Factory?
Date Sun, 28 Dec 2003 02:23:52 GMT
While you might gain some speed, you would gain more simplicity by providing 
a good guess on how large your StringBuffer needs to be on StringBuffer 
instantiation. Most of the wasted time in using StringBuffer is done when the 
(internal) buffer is too small and needs reallocated to twice its existing 
size and the copy of data to the new buffer.

-Tim

Philipp Taprogge wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> George Sexton wrote:
> 
>> This is a really bad idea because of the implementation of
>> StringBuffer.toString() and setLength().
> 
> 
> Well, Ok. But this is (IMHO correctly) regarded a bug in the current 
> StringBuffer implementation; a bug that, with luck, will be fixed some 
> day. Or you could write your own StringBuffer class.
> Concider now a StringBuffer that's working properly. What is more 
> expansive in terms of runtime: the JNDI lookup of a pooled instance or 
> the instanciation of a new one?
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message