That's not true.

Do your own tests and see if Apache + Tomcat or just Tomcat fullfill 
your requirement. Tomcat 4.1.x in some case is as good as Apache/Tomcat.

-- Jeanfrancois

Florian Ebeling wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Apache is faster for static content and has shorter startup times. And 
> HTTP implemenation is probably more mature in a pure HTTP server like 
> apache.
>
> Steve Jenkins wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wonder if anyone can help. I keep reading that one should not deploy 
>> TOMCAT on its' own on a live production server, that you should use 
>> Apache as the main webserver redirecting through to TOMCAT - but I 
>> don't find anywhere that says why.
>>
>> Why shouldn't you put just TOMCAT on a live production server? Why 
>> should you use Apache & Tomcat?
>> Anyone help?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Steve.
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org