That's not true.
Do your own tests and see if Apache + Tomcat or just Tomcat fullfill
your requirement. Tomcat 4.1.x in some case is as good as Apache/Tomcat.
-- Jeanfrancois
Florian Ebeling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache is faster for static content and has shorter startup times. And
> HTTP implemenation is probably more mature in a pure HTTP server like
> apache.
>
> Steve Jenkins wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wonder if anyone can help. I keep reading that one should not deploy
>> TOMCAT on its' own on a live production server, that you should use
>> Apache as the main webserver redirecting through to TOMCAT - but I
>> don't find anywhere that says why.
>>
>> Why shouldn't you put just TOMCAT on a live production server? Why
>> should you use Apache & Tomcat?
>> Anyone help?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Steve.
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
|