Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 26763 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2003 19:47:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp4.wanadoo.nl) (194.134.35.175) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2003 19:47:09 -0000 Received: from sjoerd (d5116084.cable.wanadoo.nl [213.17.96.132]) by smtp4.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE07741119 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2003 21:46:56 +0200 (CEST) From: "Sjoerd van Leent" To: "'Tomcat Users List'" Subject: RE: JSP Document Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 21:46:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 11.0.4920 In-Reply-To: <004b01c3749d$dd8cb720$0300a8c0@mabel> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcN0nhYLiA94I5YeR0u1yOgswlYcQAAEUU/w Message-Id: <20030906194656.DE07741119@smtp4.wanadoo.nl> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Other solution: <...> Cat Dog Especially handy when using large portions of "Normal" text -----Original Message----- From: Sam Hough [mailto:sam@redspr.com] Sent: zaterdag 6 september 2003 19:40 To: Tomcat Users List Can still produce valid XHTML by doing Cat &amp; Dog But double escaping is not very friendly. I like the fact that JSP lets you generate any format HTML, XHTML, plain text and being able to write templates in XML but this is a bit ugly. Just want to check that it is meant to be this way before I learn how it all works. Seems like they are sticking to "JSP generates anything" since the JSP 2.0 syntax ${some.thing} doesnt escape XML. I think Ive spent too much time with XSL ;) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eugene Lee" To: Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 6:23 PM Subject: Re: JSP Document > On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 06:10:26PM +0100, Sam Hough wrote: > : > : Tomcat 4.1.27 on Win32 given > : > : > : > :

Cat & Dog

> :
> : > : Generates > : > :

Cat & Dog

> : > : Can anybody confirm that this is correct behaviour? > > Why did the "&" entity get changed to a plain "&" character? That's > not kosher with HTML-4.01 specs. > > > -- > Eugene Lee > http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org