Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 8331 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2003 14:08:56 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2003 14:08:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 29848 invoked by uid 97); 17 Feb 2003 14:10:29 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 29836 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2003 14:10:28 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2003 14:10:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 6842 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2003 14:08:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 6831 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2003 14:08:35 -0000 Received: from mail.pmh.com (HELO pmh-mail.fh.pmh.com) (209.119.86.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2003 14:08:35 -0000 Received: by mail.pmh.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <17W09CBY>; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 09:08:38 -0500 Message-ID: <83F0258A9996D311B14200A0C98F173602F22EC3@aas-internet.aas.com> From: "Turner, John" To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: [OT] question about killfile Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 09:08:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N That Outlook rule is the exact rule I use for some of the folks on this list. ;) Works like a charm. I think the problem with Outlook rules is that there are server rules and client rules, and the two sometimes conflict. I've found that if I stick with 100% server rules, I do OK, Outlook's many other problems and deficiencies aside. John > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Price [mailto:eprice@ptc.com] > Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:02 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: [OT] question about killfile > > > > > Denise Mangano wrote: > > Hey all :) > > > > Sorry for the dumb question... But I keep seeing people talk about a > > killfile. Seeing as how this is the first list I've ever > subscribed to, I > > had to ask - what exactly is a killfile? > > You guessed it -- a file of email addresses whose email you > don't want > to see. It actually stems from Usenet since you couldn't reject > newsgroup postings (everyone on the server needs access to > them) but the > killfile would prevent certain posters' postings from > appearing in your > newsreader. > > > Without pointing fingers, there > > are some poster(s) I'd like to block. I know I can block > the address, or > > set up a rule in Outlook to automatically move messages > from a specific > > address to the deleted items folder... But I was just > curious if this > > killfile was something different, and more effective. > > Same diff. Note that I couldn't get Outlook filters to work very > effectively -- it seemed that for some reason I'd get lots of mail > slipping right through them. I think partly because Outlook > uses some > complex wizard to help decide for you how to filter the email, rather > than just letting you say "move all messages with ____ > content in ____ > email header to ____ folder". That's the main reason I moved > to Mozilla > for mail. (Very satisfied with it, btw.) > > > Erik > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org