Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 86877 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 06:23:18 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 06:23:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 13573 invoked by uid 97); 6 Feb 2003 06:24:56 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 13566 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 06:24:56 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 06:24:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 85463 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2003 06:23:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 85452 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 06:23:04 -0000 Received: from cust18747.lava.net (HELO mobile.mp) (64.65.105.59) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 06:23:04 -0000 Received: from cust18741.lava.net (cust18741.lava.net [64.65.105.53]) by mobile.mp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48EC38C78 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:05:07 -1000 (HST) Subject: RE: [OT]JSP defense - can you point me in the right direction From: Joe Tomcat To: Tomcat Users List In-Reply-To: <5D83C44941AFD4118B6F0002B302984F438704@EXCHANGE_SERVER> References: <5D83C44941AFD4118B6F0002B302984F438704@EXCHANGE_SERVER> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1044353624.2073.84.camel@linux.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Date: 04 Feb 2003 02:13:44 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 22:11, Denise Mangano wrote: > Wow. Thank you all so much for responding to this question. Its getting > quite frustrating hearing them saying CGI CGI CGI... especially since they > are looking for a 'quick' solution and haven't done any research to the > advantages/disadvantages of using one technology over the other. I'm glad you're getting more solid information on this. CGI is absolutely not the way to do anything beyond a very quick, small site that has one page maybe that says "The time in Kansas is..." kind of a thing. PHP is fine... but if this thing ever needs to grow at all, you need a technology such as JSP/Servlets. It's not any more difficult, and the advantages you get are huge. One of the few advantages of PHP over Java is portability. PHP runs on more systems. The *BSDs don't have such good Java support, but they can run PHP natively and easily. This was one of the factors in Yahoo's decision to use PHP instead of Java, because Yahoo uses FreeBSD for all of its servers. I wish Sun would allow the release of native JDKs for *BSD, or the GNU project would launch a competitive JRE, or Kaffe would get up to Java 1.4. But all those things may be a long way off. It's hard to think of any advantages that CGIs have over anything else. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org