tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Turner, John" <JTur...@AAS.com>
Subject RE: mod_jk2 vs. the others
Date Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:48:56 GMT

JK runnin' fine over here. <evil grin>  Sorry...couldn't resist.  :)

John


> -----Original Message-----
> From: liug [mailto:liug@mama.indstate.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:45 PM
> To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Re: mod_jk2 vs. the others
> 
> 
> 
> compile of mod_jk2 is not an issue. it is pretty straight forward.
> but whether you can config and make it work is another story :)
> If you are one of those lucky Microsoft Windows user, I do
> see some success posts. On Unix, no one got JNI in process
> working with mod_jk2 (isn't that one of the main reason you
> want to use mod_jk2 over mod_jk?)  You may be able to get 
> Unix domain socket working  if you follow Paul's suggestion:
> The work-around for that was to put all the jar files from
> $TOMCAT/server/lib in $TOMCAT/commons/lib -- this by-passes 
> the class loader
> hierarchy (defeating the purpose of the classloader 
> hierarchy's security
> mechanisms) but it allows the unix domain sockets to work.
> The problem exists since earlier versions of 4.1.x. 
> This makes me wondering if mod_jk2 is being actively worked on.
> 
> frank
>  
> 
> Mike Jackson <mjackson@cdi-hq.com> wrote:
> > I've got mod_jk working, not mod_jk2.  But I did finally get mod_jk2
> > compiled (between myself and another).  I asked the other 
> guy to take notes
> > so we could repeat it with a
> > howto in mind, but he hasn't given the notes to me yet.
> 
> > If someone has a "sample" mod_jk2 configuration using a 
> vanilla apache2.x
> > and tomcat4.x then I can add that to the end of it.  When I 
> get it that is.
> 
> > The old version of mod_jk I was able to get to compile by 
> just making a
> > minor code tweak, but with the new ant build I'm not sure 
> where it's at.  I
> > may even have it compiled, but I haven't (to be completely 
> honest) looked.
> > Been too busy with work to play lately.
> 
> > --mikej
> > -=-----
> > mike jackson
> > mjackson@cdi-hq.com
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Turner, John [mailto:JTurner@AAS.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:23 AM
> >> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> >> Subject: RE: mod_jk2 vs. the others (was: mod_webapp random error)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> If you've got it working, stick with it, and while you're at it,
> >> how about a
> >> config HOWTO?  Lots of JK2 problems recently on the list. ;)
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Mike Jackson [mailto:mjackson@cdi-hq.com]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:18 PM
> >> > To: Tomcat Users List
> >> > Subject: RE: mod_jk2 vs. the others (was: mod_webapp 
> random error)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hmm, ok, seems like the consensus is to use mod_jk for now.
> >> > Now I'll just
> >> > have to get that to compile under unixware (not the easiest
> >> > thing in the
> >> > world).
> >> >
> >> > Also, on a somewhat related thought, is there anyone else out
> >> > there running
> >> > apache+tomcat on unixware?  I'd like to compare problems from
> >> > time to time.
> >> >
> >> > --mikej
> >> > -=-----
> >> > mike jackson
> >> > mjackson@cdi-hq.com
> >> >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: Turner, John [mailto:JTurner@AAS.com]
> >> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:13 AM
> >> > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> >> > > Subject: RE: mod_jk2 vs. the others (was: mod_webapp 
> random error)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > JK2 is technically best with Apache 2 because of the 
> pre-fork issue.
> >> > >
> >> > > JK works with both Apache 1.3 and 2.
> >> > >
> >> > > John
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > From: Mike Jackson [mailto:mjackson@cdi-hq.com]
> >> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:06 PM
> >> > > > To: Tomcat Users List
> >> > > > Subject: RE: mod_jk2 vs. the others (was: mod_webapp 
> random error)
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Should I be using mod_jk with apache 2.x?  I thought 
> that mod_jk2
> >> > > > was for apache 2.x mostly, and that mod_jk was 
> geared more towards
> >> > > > use with apache 1.3.x.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > For that matter I've had all sorts of fun getting 
> mod_jk2 to work,
> >> > > > but mod_jk is easy...
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --mikej
> >> > > > -=-----
> >> > > > mike jackson
> >> > > > mjackson@cdi-hq.com
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > From: Turner, John [mailto:JTurner@AAS.com]
> >> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:54 AM
> >> > > > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> >> > > > > Subject: RE: mod_jk2 vs. the others (was: mod_webapp
> >> > random error)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I wouldn't use mod_webapp at all.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > JK (mod_jk) has lots of features over mod_webapp:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > - ability to load balance
> >> > > > > - ability to separate static content from dynamic content
> >> > > > > - and more, search the archives, this is a FAQ
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > JK2 is the "newer" version of JK.  It's where the dev team
> >> > > > is focusing its
> >> > > > > efforts.  So, going forward, the recommended 
> choices are mod_jk
> >> > > > > and mod_jk2.
> >> > > > > Which you use is up to you.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > John
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > > From: Diego Algorta Casamayou
> >> > > > [mailto:diego.algorta@bancaqm.com.uy]
> >> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:50 PM
> >> > > > > > To: Tomcat Users List
> >> > > > > > Subject: mod_jk2 vs. the others (was: mod_webapp 
> random error)
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Any experience with mod_jk2?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Does it everything mod_jk and mod_webapp can do?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > If it's newer, why should I use mod_jk or 
> mod_webapp instead
> >> > > > > > of mod_jk2?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Thank you
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > > > > From: "Chris Davies" <c.davies@cdavies.org>
> >> > > > > > To: "Tomcat Users List" <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> >> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:56 PM
> >> > > > > > Subject: Re: mod_webapp random error
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I've never had this problem with mod_webapp, it
sounds
> >> > > > very strange.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > If you possibly can, switch to mod_jk. I think

> I'm right in
> >> > > > > > saying that
> >> > > > > > most
> >> > > > > > > people consider mod_webapp as hackish, and certainly
> >> > > > > > inferior to jk/jk2.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I find it useful because it is so well documented
I can
> >> > > > > > extend it with
> >> > > > > > very
> >> > > > > > > little effort, but it may not be suited to a production
> >> > > > environment.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > C.Davies
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Quoting Diego Algorta Casamayou
> >> > <diego.algorta@bancaqm.com.uy>:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Yes, it's listening on port 8008.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > The thing is that it WORKS OK "almost 
> everytime" :-/ BUT,
> >> > > > > > sometimes and
> >> > > > > > > > without apparent reason it stops working
and 
> I have to
> >> > > > > > restart apache
> >> > > > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > > tomcat to get it working again. SOMETIMES
it 
> works just
> >> > > > > > waiting about 10
> >> > > > > > > > of
> >> > > > > > > > 15 seconds and reloading the page. It's 
> really annoying
> >> > > > > > because it's a
> >> > > > > > > > random behavior. Sometimes I can reproduce

> the error when
> >> > > > > > I reppeatidly
> >> > > > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > > quickly (sure bad english writing) reload
the page.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > This is my server.xml file (real IP replaced
with
> >> > > > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Bytes
> >> > > > > > > > DAC
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> > > > tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> > > > tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> > tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> > > > tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> > tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> > tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> > tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >> >
> >>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message