tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felipe Schnack <>
Subject RE: Best Logging practices
Date Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:25:33 GMT
  I know what you mean, but maybe he doesn't really need what log4j
offers in better ways than jdk1.4
  I use it for very simple logging and have no problems with it.

On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 12:57, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
> Howdy,
> >What do you think of this opinion: I am inclined to use the JDK1.4
> >logger just because it's included in rt.jar, thus fewer jars and
> shorter
> >classpath, and all that.
> I think everyone is free to have their own opinion.
> I don't think the length of the classpath is a relevant argument to
> anything.  I don't think JDK 1.4 is well implemented.  I do think log4j
> is superior in many ways.  I do think using JDK 1.4 logging is a
> mistake.  I do think you should check out some of the documentation on
> both packages, as well as comparisons available on this list's archives,
> the log4j list archives, and the log4j documentation site.
> And all that ;)
> Yoav Shapira
> Millennium ChemInformatics
> This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail
is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied,
printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please
immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Felipe Schnack
Analista de Sistemas
Cel.: (51)91287530
Linux Counter #281893

Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis
Fone/Fax.: (51)32303341

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message