Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 84361 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2003 12:51:30 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2003 12:51:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 874 invoked by uid 97); 8 Jan 2003 12:52:22 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 817 invoked by uid 97); 8 Jan 2003 12:52:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 804 invoked by uid 98); 8 Jan 2003 12:52:20 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Path: not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Subject: Simultanous access to Ajp13 connector by more than one apache? Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 13:50:33 +0100 Organization: Probably a good idea Lines: 23 Message-ID: <87wulfztye.fsf@home.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, i386-debian-linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3EiWnCG1+PlUM3B0D9kzUwH+q60= Sender: news X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Platform: Intel PIII, debian testing/unstable (sarge) Blackdown JDK 1.3.1 (j2sdk 1.3.1.0b-2), tomcat4 4.1.16-1, apache 1.3.26-1.1, apache-ssl 1.3.26+1.48-2 Is it possible to access an Ajp13 connector in tomcat 4.1.x at the same time, by more than one apache web server? The reason I'm asking is that debian package apache without SSL and apache with SSL as separate daemon processes. I'm seeing some strange behaviour right now (sometimes it's possible to connect to the Ajp13 connector on port 8009, sometimes it's not. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't), and I was wondering if this was caused by two separate clients attempting to access the Ajp13 connector simultanously? All info appreciated! Thanx! - Steinar -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: