tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Ricker <bric...@wellinx.com>
Subject Re: concern about Apache + mod_jk + Tomcat cluster
Date Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:54:09 GMT
Can you post the workers.properties file? I use equal lblweight (I think
that is the name of the property) set to 100 for the 4 Tomcat instances.

I have a nearly identical setup: twp Apache 1.3.27 server running on
Redhat 7.3 load balancing across 4.0.6 Tomcat instances running on two
Solaris 8 servers. We have no performance issues and I am using the
default Processor settings in server.xml. We go through roughly 1
million hits a month.

HTH,

Ben Ricker

On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 11:04, YOU, JERRY (SBCSI) wrote:
> Hi,
> I installed the Apache1.3.27, mod_jk1.2.1 and Tomcat4.1.18 recently on our
> Solaris6 machine. The approach is that let 1 apache as web server dispatches
> requestes to the 3 tomcat server instances. There is no error in the
> configuration, 
> and install. But when I was load-testing the application, I noticed that
> there were
> lots of error message shown in the mod_jk file, although all the requests
> were
> dispatched to the tomcat servers and responded with 200.
> 
> I then changed the 3 tomcat servers' configure as following:
>     <Connector className="org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector"
>                port="11009" minProcessors="1" maxProcessors="1"
>                acceptCount="10" debug="1"/>
> So now every Tomcat can only accept 1 request at the same time.
> I then sent 3 concurrent requests to the cluster: tomcat21, tomcat22,
> tomcat23.
> >From the debug/log file, I think the mod_jk and tomcats are working like :
> 1, 3 requests reaches mod_jk, mod_jk sends requests to tomcat21
> 2, tomcat21 accepts the first one and rejects the other 2,
> 3, mod_jk logs errors in mod_jk.log, reports the tomcat is down or network
> problem.
> 4, mod_jk then sends the 2 to tomcat22
> 5, tomcat22 accepts 1 and rejects the other.
> 6, mod_jk again logs errors.
> 7. mod_jk sends the alst one to tomcat23,
> 8, tomcat 23 accepts it.
> 
> I think there is nothing wrong with this procedure, but besides the annoying
> error messages,
> the whole performance is poor due to the time spent in the probes. I also
> suspect that
> the socket connection in Solaris6 is too slow, for some reason.
> 
> I have questions for those who have the tomcat cluster in there production
> site:
> how about the performance in your site? Is there anything wrong with my
> configuration or should
> I use JK2 to improve performance?
> 
> The configuration files and log files are attached with this email.
> 
> OS: Solaris 6
> Apache1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1.18, mod_jk1.2.1( I can not find the binary mod_jk
> at the apache.org site
> under solaris6 directory, so, I download the one in Solaris8 dir).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jerry You <<tomcat_23_catalina.log>>  <<the_change_to_httpd.conf>>
 
> <<workers.properties>>  <<change_to_tomcat21_server.xml>>  
> <<tomcat_21_catalina.log>>  <<tomact_22_catalina.log>> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
-- 
Ben Ricker <bricker@wellinx.com>
Wellinx.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message