Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 11106 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 21:03:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 21:03:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 18093 invoked by uid 97); 2 Dec 2002 21:03:55 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18040 invoked by uid 97); 2 Dec 2002 21:03:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18028 invoked by uid 98); 2 Dec 2002 21:03:54 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.12 much slower than Tomcat 4.0.3 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:02:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: tomcat 4.1.12 much slower than Tomcat 4.0.3 Thread-Index: AcKaRayZITR8LRODRVaTQO/H96E8gwAADtHA From: "Shapira, Yoav" To: "Tomcat Users List" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, I'm tempted to mark this as off-topic, but maybe not yet ;) >Heard of any IE issues ???? crazy I know, its html by then. Do you specify a strict HTML DTD? If so, IE6 will render a bit more slowly. How did you determine it's a browser issue? Do you have a browser-independent (cactus, mockobjects, load, JMeter, whatever) test you can run against 4.0.3 and then 4.1.12 to verify response time and latency differences? Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: