Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 38560 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 17:46:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 17:46:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 20688 invoked by uid 97); 2 Dec 2002 17:46:56 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20656 invoked by uid 97); 2 Dec 2002 17:46:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20644 invoked by uid 98); 2 Dec 2002 17:46:55 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <83F0258A9996D311B14200A0C98F173602755C7B@aas-internet.aas.com> From: "Turner, John" To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.12 much slower than Tomcat 4.0.3 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:45:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N When you say "no other changes" are you taking into account that the defaults for Tomcat 4.1.12 may be quite a bit different than 4.0.3? That is, have you gone through your 4.1.12 server.xml and verified that every option/parameter is equivalent to the same parameter as the 4.0.3 server.xml, and have you verified that any new parameters or configuration options in 4.1.12 aren't doing something that you don't expect? John > -----Original Message----- > From: Ron Day [mailto:ronday@ronday.cc] > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 12:38 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.12 much slower than Tomcat 4.0.3 > > > Craig, thanks for suggeations but..... > > Not 15 seconds, but 10 times slower than 4.0.3 > > what puzzles me is that environment is identical except that > I use 4.1.12 > version rather than 4.0.3 > > No other changes between versions and when I go back to 4.0.3 > performance > improves. > > ron > > -----Original Message----- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 11:26 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.12 much slower than Tomcat 4.0.3 > > > > > On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Ron Day wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 10:24:26 -0600 > > From: Ron Day > > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: tomcat 4.1.12 much slower than Tomcat 4.0.3 > > > > Hi, > > > > I have tried re-installing Tomcat 4.1.12 , moving to JDK1.4.1, but: > > > > 15 second delays sound like something wierd with your DNS > server (perhaps > you've got access logging enabled?) or database. There's nothing in > Tomcat that would do this -- and, in fact, most users see a > performance > boost, especially with JSP pages that use lots of custom tags. > > Craig > > > My original post, still happening: This is post..... > > > > ********************************** > > > > I just installed Tomcat 4.1.12. > > > > But now my tomcat 4.0.3 webapps run about 10-20 times slower. > > These are my class exercises, ranging from small single > servlets to medium > > projects. > > > > Anyone have any ideas as to why this may be. > > > > I did not change anything, and it happens for jsp's and servlets !!! > > > > It seems that the tomcat examples work fine !!!!! > > > > ********************************** > > > > ron > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: