tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Malachi de AElfweald <mala...@tremerechantry.com>
Subject Re: AW: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost
Date Tue, 08 Oct 2002 20:17:55 GMT
is jk2 still slow with inprocess-JNI, cuz that is why I want to use it.

Malachi


10/8/2002 11:50:35 AM, "Michael Riess" <sdemr@selltec.de> wrote:

>Thanks for the advice, but that doesn't work. I guess it's a bug, not a
>feature ;-). For now I will use mod_jk until jk2 is stable. jk2 seemed a bit
>slow anyway ... but it will definitely be faster than mod_jk as soon as the
>unix sockets and 1.4 NIO are working.
>
>Mike
>
>-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Mladen Turk [mailto:mturk@mappingsoft.com]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2002 20:38
>An: 'Tomcat Users List'; riess@selltec.de
>Betreff: RE: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Riess [mailto:sdemr@selltec.de]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:34 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: AW: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost
>>
>>
>> Just for clarity: I have an webapp that should work with or
>> without SSL, so I need a way to map URIs to that webapp
>> without regard of the virtual host it comes from.
>> Alternatively, I could use two mappings for the two vhosts
>> (the default and the SSL host), but anyway: I would
>> appreciate for any suggestion for the right wk2.properties
>> definitions.
>>
>
>Then just use the default mapping
>
>[uri:/xyz/*]
>
>Without any host definitions.
>
>
>> Here's my guess #1 (doesn't work)
>>
>> [uri:192.168.42.42:*/xyz/*]
>>
>> and guess #2 (doesn't work either)
>>
>> [uri:192.168.42.42:80/xyz/*]
>> [uri:192.168.42.42:443/xyz/*]
>>
>> Tried using * instead of IP (you guessed right ... doesn't work).
>>
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Mladen Turk [mailto:mturk@mappingsoft.com]
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2002 20:11
>> An: 'Tomcat Users List'; riess@selltec.de
>> Betreff: RE: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Michael Riess [mailto:sdemr@selltec.de]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:52 PM
>> > To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
>> > Subject: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost
>> >
>> >
>> > If anyone knows how to map requests from a virtual host
>> > (*:443) to a context ... I would be very thankful for any hint.
>> >
>> > I use mod_jk2 2.0.0 with Apache 2.0.43, mapping via [uri:/xyz/*]
>> > works, but mapping via [uri:*:443] doesn't do anything ...
>> >
>> > question: shouldn't [uri:/xyz/*] map uris from any virtual
>> host, not
>> > just the default one?
>>
>> If you declared host with
>> [uri:*:443]
>> Meaning any (virtual)hostname having port 443 then you have
>> to specify the mapping for such host.
>>
>>
>> Use the
>> [uri:*:443/xyz/*]
>>
>> Since you have declared host:port combination all the uri
>> mappings needs to be prefixed by that host:port. This
>> behavior is intentional cause you may wish not to map any
>> context on that host:port combination.
>>
>>
>> MT.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>> For
>> additional commands, e-mail:
>> <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To
>> unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>> For
>> additional commands, e-mail:
>> <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message