tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Riess" <sd...@selltec.de>
Subject AW: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost
Date Tue, 08 Oct 2002 18:50:35 GMT
Thanks for the advice, but that doesn't work. I guess it's a bug, not a
feature ;-). For now I will use mod_jk until jk2 is stable. jk2 seemed a bit
slow anyway ... but it will definitely be faster than mod_jk as soon as the
unix sockets and 1.4 NIO are working.

Mike

-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Mladen Turk [mailto:mturk@mappingsoft.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2002 20:38
An: 'Tomcat Users List'; riess@selltec.de
Betreff: RE: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Riess [mailto:sdemr@selltec.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:34 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: AW: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost
>
>
> Just for clarity: I have an webapp that should work with or
> without SSL, so I need a way to map URIs to that webapp
> without regard of the virtual host it comes from.
> Alternatively, I could use two mappings for the two vhosts
> (the default and the SSL host), but anyway: I would
> appreciate for any suggestion for the right wk2.properties
> definitions.
>

Then just use the default mapping

[uri:/xyz/*]

Without any host definitions.


> Here's my guess #1 (doesn't work)
>
> [uri:192.168.42.42:*/xyz/*]
>
> and guess #2 (doesn't work either)
>
> [uri:192.168.42.42:80/xyz/*]
> [uri:192.168.42.42:443/xyz/*]
>
> Tried using * instead of IP (you guessed right ... doesn't work).
>
>
> Mike
>
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Mladen Turk [mailto:mturk@mappingsoft.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2002 20:11
> An: 'Tomcat Users List'; riess@selltec.de
> Betreff: RE: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Riess [mailto:sdemr@selltec.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:52 PM
> > To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> > Subject: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost
> >
> >
> > If anyone knows how to map requests from a virtual host
> > (*:443) to a context ... I would be very thankful for any hint.
> >
> > I use mod_jk2 2.0.0 with Apache 2.0.43, mapping via [uri:/xyz/*]
> > works, but mapping via [uri:*:443] doesn't do anything ...
> >
> > question: shouldn't [uri:/xyz/*] map uris from any virtual
> host, not
> > just the default one?
>
> If you declared host with
> [uri:*:443]
> Meaning any (virtual)hostname having port 443 then you have
> to specify the mapping for such host.
>
>
> Use the
> [uri:*:443/xyz/*]
>
> Since you have declared host:port combination all the uri
> mappings needs to be prefixed by that host:port. This
> behavior is intentional cause you may wish not to map any
> context on that host:port combination.
>
>
> MT.
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For
> additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To
> unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For
> additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message