tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Madere, Colin" <colin.mad...@ieminc.com>
Subject RE: mod_jk build problems
Date Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:09:16 GMT
Thanks, got it built by not using JNI (and copying the built 'libtool' to
the 'common' directory after doing ./configure before running 'make') but
haven't been able to test it since now TC 4.1.12 won't start up :)  New post
incoming!

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Tref Gare [SMTP:TrefG@areeba.com.au]
> Sent:	Sunday, October 27, 2002 4:03 PM
> To:	Tomcat Users List
> Subject:	RE: mod_jk build problems
> 
> Hi Colin,
> 
> No answers to the compilation problems I'm afraid as I was suffering
> more or less the same ones last week with no solutions.
> 
> However I do know you can get a precompiled binary of mod_jk.so for
> Solaris from here.  Might step around your problem.
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1
> .2.0/bin/solaris8/
> 
> However I note there are versions for sol 6 and 8 but not 7.  Hope it's
> some help at any rate.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Tref Gare
> Development Consultant
> Areeba
> Level 19/114 William St, Melbourne VIC 3000
> email: trefg@areeba.com.au
> phone: +61 3 9642 5553
> fax: +61 3 9642 1335
> website: http://www.areeba.com.au
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "This email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity
> named above and contains information that is confidential. No
> confidentiality is waived or lost by any mis-transmission. If you
> received this correspondence in error, please notify the sender and
> immediately delete it from your system. You must not disclose, copy or
> rely on any part of this correspondence if you are not the intended
> recipient. Any communication directed to clients via this message is
> subject to our Agreement and relevant Project Schedule. Any information
> that is transmitted via email which may offend may have been sent
> without knowledge or the consent of Areeba."
> ------------------------------------------------------
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Madere, Colin [mailto:colin.madere@ieminc.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 10:04 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List '
> Subject: RE: mod_jk build problems
> 
> That's it?  No one has any clue?  An answer to _any_ of the questions
> asked?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert L Sowders
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Sent: 10/25/02 8:44 PM
> Subject: Re: mod_jk build problems
> 
> Send it to the bug database.
> 
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi
> 
> Guidelines are here.
> 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/bugwritinghelp.html
> 
> rls
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Madere, Colin" <colin.madere@ieminc.com>
> 10/25/2002 05:11 PM
> Please respond to "Tomcat Users List"
> 
>  
>         To:     "'tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org'"
> <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
>         cc: 
>         Subject:        mod_jk build problems
> 
> 1) There seems to be an error in the scope of the make for mod_jk where
> it
> expects to find 'libtool' in the common directory but it is in the
> parent
> directory of the common directory.  (couldn't find a good place to
> submit
> this problem except here)
> 
> 2) Let me prefix my problem description with some specs:
> Solaris 2.7 on x86 (but plan to deploy on SPARC under Solaris 2.7 and
> 2.8)
> gcc 3.2
> J2SDK 1.4.1_01
> Apache 2.0.43 (built from src)
> Tomcat 4.1
> 
> The docs at
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html
> dont' quite seem to cover everything (you know what I mean).  I build
> with
> the "--enable-jni" since it is suggested for Apache 2.0 and I get a
> "jk_jnicb.so" but I don't get a "mod_jk.so" as the documentation
> suggests.
> Is it correct behavior that a "mod_jk.so" NOT get built when using that
> build option?  If so, would help if that was noted in docs.
> 
> Now assuming all is well, do I assume that the rest of the docs (in 
> regards
> to installation) when referring to "mod_jk.so" mean "mod_jk.so or
> jk_jnicb.so"?
> 
> When I try to go into the build directory under 'jk' named 'Apache-2.0'
> (which the docs say where the resulting "mod_jk.so" is to be built) and 
> try
> to do a 'make' I get an error "libtool: unrecognized option '-g' ".
> 
> Any assistance would be greatly appreciated including suggestions for 
> using
> other connectors if my setup suggests such a move.
> 
> Colin Madere
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message