Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 79745 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2002 16:54:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2002 16:54:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 2068 invoked by uid 97); 30 Sep 2002 16:55:04 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1958 invoked by uid 97); 30 Sep 2002 16:55:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1886 invoked by uid 98); 30 Sep 2002 16:55:03 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <83F0258A9996D311B14200A0C98F17360275587F@aas-internet.aas.com> From: "Turner, John" To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk.so Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:53:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Which one did you download? EAPI or no EAPI? John > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Ricker [mailto:bricker@wellinx.com] > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:27 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Problem with mod_jk.so > > > I downloaded the binary of mod_jk.so from Jakarta's downloads in > /builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/linux/ > i386. I am > running Apache 1.3.26 with Tomcat 4.05 on Red Hat Linux release 7.1 > (Seawolf). The binary is compiled for 7.2, however. That may > explain the > following error when trying to start Apache: > > > [root@dev bin]# ./apachectl configtest > Syntax error on line 208 of /usr/local/apache-new/conf/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so into > server: /usr/local/apache-new/libexec/mod_jk.so: undefined > symbol: ap_ctx_get > > Any ideas? Do I need to upgrade gcc, possibly? What do the > binaries rely upon? > > Thanks in advance, > > Ben Ricker > > -- > Ben Ricker > Wellinx.com > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: